CORT vs. BOOT

In the year-to-date period, CORT achieves a 61.39% return, which is significantly lower than BOOT's 89.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CORT has outperformed BOOT with an annualized return of 32.50%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively lower 22.28% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CORT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the BOOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORT and BOOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CORT nor BOOT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CORT drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than BOOT's maximum drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORT and BOOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) is 12.22%, while Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that CORT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.