COPX vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
COPX and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both COPX and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COPX or LIT.
Key characteristics
| COPX | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.56% | -10.11% |
| 1Y Return | 33.04% | -26.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.37% | -8.27% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 23.02% | 12.90% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.40% | 7.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | -0.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.00% | 27.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.16% | -61.91% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -51.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and LIT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COPX vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 32.56% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -10.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COPX having a 7.40% annualized return and LIT not far ahead at 7.42%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPX vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COPX vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COPX vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than LIT's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% | 2.31% | 0.71% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
COPX vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -61.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COPX vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 8.94% and 8.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.