COPP vs. HG=F
COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) is Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while HG=F (Copper) is an asset.
Performance
COPP vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPP
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 62.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPP vs. HG=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 6.15% | 74.02% | 4.25% |
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPP vs. HG=F — Risk / Return Rank
COPP
HG=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPP vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPP | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPP vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPP | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | — | — |
Volatility
COPP vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPP | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.42% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.62% | — | — |
Find the right allocation for COPP and HG=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer