COP vs. QCLN
COP (ConocoPhillips Company) is a stock, while QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, COP returned 13.26%/yr vs 16.79%/yr for QCLN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COP vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 19.27% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.20% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 13.26%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.79% annualized return.
COP
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 6M
- 20.40%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
QCLN
- 1D
- -6.27%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- 37.20%
- 6M
- 31.57%
- 1Y
- 92.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.79%
COP vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 19.27% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 37.20% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 184.00% | 42.65% | -12.38% | 32.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between COP and QCLN is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007 | 0.40 |
The correlation between COP and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COP vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
COP
QCLN
COP vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COP | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 5.64 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 18.14 | -14.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COP vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COP | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.55% | -76.18% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -16.40% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.19% | -56.08% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -69.49% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.66% | -71.73% | +1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.20% | -29.12% | +11.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -43.40% | +17.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 5.09% | +2.07% |
Volatility
COP vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 9.12%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 17.77%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COP | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 17.77% | -8.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.71% | 29.96% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.59% | 37.45% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 38.54% | -5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 35.21% | +2.41% |
Dividends
COP vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than QCLN's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 3.00% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COP and QCLN have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to COP (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COP and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer