COP vs. MPC
Compare and contrast key facts about ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COP or MPC.
Correlation
The correlation between COP and MPC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COP vs. MPC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
COP:
-0.63
MPC:
-0.31
COP:
-0.79
MPC:
-0.24
COP:
0.91
MPC:
0.97
COP:
-0.53
MPC:
-0.25
COP:
-1.05
MPC:
-0.47
COP:
13.60%
MPC:
19.44%
COP:
22.58%
MPC:
29.47%
COP:
-70.66%
MPC:
-79.67%
COP:
-26.73%
MPC:
-37.41%
Fundamentals
COP:
$127.11B
MPC:
$44.35B
COP:
$8.43
MPC:
$12.89
COP:
11.66
MPC:
10.71
COP:
8.24
MPC:
15.65
COP:
$55.68B
MPC:
$142.17B
COP:
$17.32B
MPC:
$11.45B
COP:
$25.18B
MPC:
$10.68B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a -15.11% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's -7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 6.42%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
COP
-15.11%
-15.74%
-11.14%
-15.41%
12.63%
6.42%
MPC
-7.11%
-15.06%
-20.85%
-10.38%
21.00%
15.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COP vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COP vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison
COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than MPC's 2.51% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 3.26% | 3.37% | 4.20% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% | 4.11% | 3.82% |
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 2.51% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 3.63% | 5.61% | 3.52% | 3.12% | 2.30% | 2.70% | 2.20% | 2.04% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
COP vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -70.66%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and MPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COP vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 6.58%, while Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
COP vs. MPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities