PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COP vs. MPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


COPMPC
YTD Return12.10%35.13%
1Y Return32.84%66.48%
3Y Return (Ann)42.43%59.70%
5Y Return (Ann)19.83%31.70%
10Y Return (Ann)9.17%19.43%
Sharpe Ratio1.352.47
Daily Std Dev22.78%26.61%
Max Drawdown-70.66%-79.67%
Current Drawdown-2.55%-8.95%

Fundamentals


COPMPC
Market Cap$151.52B$70.76B
EPS$9.06$23.62
PE Ratio14.288.31
PEG Ratio0.7215.65
Revenue (TTM)$57.86B$149.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$39.60B$26.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$24.75B$16.95B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between COP and MPC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

COP vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 35.13% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 9.17%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 19.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
11.01%
38.07%
COP
MPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ConocoPhillips Company

Marathon Petroleum Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COP vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COP, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COP, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COP, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COP, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COP, currently valued at 4.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.71
MPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPC, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPC, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPC, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPC, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPC, currently valued at 12.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.75

COP vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of COP and MPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.35
2.47
COP
MPC

Dividends

COP vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than MPC's 1.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.29%3.34%4.20%2.69%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%3.82%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.58%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%1.68%

Drawdowns

COP vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -70.66%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and MPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-2.55%
-8.95%
COP
MPC

Volatility

COP vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 3.65%, while Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.65%
7.40%
COP
MPC

Financials

COP vs. MPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items