PortfoliosLab logo
COP vs. MPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COP and MPC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

COP vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COP:

-0.65

MPC:

-0.13

Sortino Ratio

COP:

-0.78

MPC:

0.09

Omega Ratio

COP:

0.89

MPC:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

COP:

-0.60

MPC:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

COP:

-1.49

MPC:

-0.27

Ulcer Index

COP:

14.81%

MPC:

14.86%

Daily Std Dev

COP:

32.68%

MPC:

36.09%

Max Drawdown

COP:

-70.66%

MPC:

-79.67%

Current Drawdown

COP:

-29.01%

MPC:

-23.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COP:

$117.35B

MPC:

$50.78B

EPS

COP:

$7.89

MPC:

$7.26

PE Ratio

COP:

11.78

MPC:

22.77

PEG Ratio

COP:

8.24

MPC:

2.81

PS Ratio

COP:

1.99

MPC:

0.37

PB Ratio

COP:

1.79

MPC:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

COP:

$58.53B

MPC:

$138.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COP:

$23.47B

MPC:

$8.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

COP:

$25.52B

MPC:

$9.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a -6.04% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 18.33% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 6.87%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.73% annualized return.


COP

YTD

-6.04%

1M

7.03%

6M

-17.04%

1Y

-21.28%

5Y*

21.87%

10Y*

6.87%

MPC

YTD

18.33%

1M

32.28%

6M

5.39%

1Y

-4.55%

5Y*

44.91%

10Y*

15.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COP vs. MPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPC is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPC is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPC is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPC is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPC is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPC is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COP vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COP Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COP and MPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

COP vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than MPC's 1.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.32%2.54%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.61%2.43%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%

Drawdowns

COP vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -70.66%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and MPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COP vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

ConocoPhillips Company (COP) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 7.36%. This indicates that COP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COP vs. MPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
17.10B
31.85B
(COP) Total Revenue
(MPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COP vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ConocoPhillips Company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
63.8%
4.3%
(COP) Gross Margin
(MPC) Gross Margin
COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 10.91B and revenue of 17.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 31.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 8.41B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 687.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.85B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of -74.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.