CONY vs. QQQ
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. CONY is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -36.44% vs 43.30% for QQQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CONY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
CONY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
CONY vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 81.04% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and QQQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CONY and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
QQQ
CONY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 2.73 | -3.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | 3.55 | -4.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.47 | -0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 3.71 | -4.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 14.30 | -15.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 2.73 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.41 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -82.97% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -11.96% | -51.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | 0.00% | -55.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -32.79% | +10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.50% | 3.11% | +34.39% |
Volatility
CONY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.91% | 4.48% | +11.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 12.11% | +31.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.03% | 15.95% | +42.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 22.39% | +37.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 22.30% | +37.70% |
CONY vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and QQQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 43.30% vs -36.44% for CONY. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 43.30% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer