CONY vs. OARK
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while OARK is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -36.44% vs 37.53% for OARK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CONY vs. OARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than OARK's 7.80% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OARK
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. OARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 81.04% |
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 7.80% | 20.37% | 7.32% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and OARK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CONY and OARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. OARK — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
OARK
CONY vs. OARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | OARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 1.35 | -1.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | 1.86 | -2.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.66 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 3.95 | -4.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | OARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 1.35 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.41 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. OARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than OARK's maximum drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and OARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | OARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -35.48% | -28.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -23.26% | -40.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -5.26% | -49.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -10.59% | -11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.50% | 9.76% | +27.74% |
Volatility
CONY vs. OARK - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) at 6.41%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | OARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.91% | 6.41% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 19.93% | +23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.03% | 28.02% | +30.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 30.85% | +29.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 30.85% | +29.15% |
CONY vs. OARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CONY and OARK have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CONY vs. OARK - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, more than OARK's 63.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | 63.29% | 61.86% | 47.86% | 45.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and OARK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to OARK (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs OARK's -35.48%.
On 1-year performance, OARK leads with 37.53% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, OARK has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OARK has performed better with a 37.53% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY and OARK have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 63.29% for OARK.
CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while OARK is Options Trading.
OARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and OARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer