CONY vs. AMZY
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while AMZY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -36.44% vs 16.78% for AMZY. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CONY vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 6.01% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZY
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 6.01%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 81.04% |
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 6.01% | 10.39% | 35.28% | 9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and AMZY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
AMZY
CONY vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 0.72 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | 1.09 | -1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.90 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 2.25 | -3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 0.72 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.99 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than AMZY's maximum drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and AMZY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -23.70% | -39.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -19.61% | -43.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -5.34% | -49.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -5.32% | -16.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.50% | 7.86% | +29.64% |
Volatility
CONY vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) at 5.75%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.91% | 5.75% | +10.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 15.91% | +27.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.03% | 23.48% | +34.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 25.04% | +34.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 25.04% | +34.96% |
CONY vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CONY and AMZY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CONY vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, more than AMZY's 56.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 56.39% | 52.59% | 47.91% | 9.90% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and AMZY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to AMZY (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs AMZY's -23.70%.
On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 16.78% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZY has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 16.78% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY and AMZY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 56.39% for AMZY.
CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZY is Options Trading.
AMZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and AMZY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer