PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONY vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -24.40% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 111.33% return.


CONY

1D
1.00%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-24.40%
6M
-29.90%
1Y
-47.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
2.03%
1M
13.75%
YTD
111.33%
6M
112.18%
1Y
221.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-24.40%-26.34%23.62%68.78%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
111.33%53.93%-17.00%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CONY and AMDY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CONYAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.56

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

8.07

-8.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

18.01

-19.21

CONY vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CONY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than AMDY's maximum drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONYAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.57%

-53.92%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-27.59%

-35.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.17%

0.00%

-57.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.78%

-17.79%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.72%

12.34%

+27.38%

Volatility

CONY vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) is 15.64%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.60%. This indicates that CONY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONYAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.64%

20.60%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.35%

43.29%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.83%

56.05%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.90%

46.87%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.90%

46.87%

+13.03%

CONY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

CONY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 198.50%, more than AMDY's 62.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
62.77%80.68%109.98%6.68%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
198.50%192.07%155.66%16.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CONY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to CONY (15.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 221.30% vs -47.70% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 221.30% return vs -47.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 198.50%, compared with 62.77% for AMDY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONY and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer