PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CONL vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and QQQM is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CONL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
171.48%
70.28%
CONL
QQQM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CONL:

0.63

QQQM:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

CONL:

2.10

QQQM:

2.47

Omega Ratio

CONL:

1.23

QQQM:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

CONL:

1.35

QQQM:

2.39

Martin Ratio

CONL:

2.34

QQQM:

8.69

Ulcer Index

CONL:

45.87%

QQQM:

3.73%

Daily Std Dev

CONL:

169.82%

QQQM:

17.43%

Max Drawdown

CONL:

-82.62%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

CONL:

-33.00%

QQQM:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a 68.54% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 30.25% return.


CONL

YTD

68.54%

1M

10.84%

6M

1.93%

1Y

100.85%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QQQM

YTD

30.25%

1M

3.60%

6M

11.11%

1Y

32.57%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for CONL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for QQQM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CONL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CONL, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.631.86
The chart of Sortino ratio for CONL, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.102.47
The chart of Omega ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.231.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.352.39
The chart of Martin ratio for CONL, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.348.69
CONL
QQQM

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.63
1.86
CONL
QQQM

Dividends

CONL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CONL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than QQQM's 0.62% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.62%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

CONL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -82.62%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-33.00%
0
CONL
QQQM

Volatility

CONL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 47.92% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.23%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
47.92%
4.23%
CONL
QQQM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab