PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CONL vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and QQQ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CONL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.75%
10.77%
CONL
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CONL:

0.79

QQQ:

1.89

Sortino Ratio

CONL:

2.23

QQQ:

2.50

Omega Ratio

CONL:

1.25

QQQ:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

CONL:

1.70

QQQ:

2.43

Martin Ratio

CONL:

2.95

QQQ:

8.82

Ulcer Index

CONL:

45.82%

QQQ:

3.74%

Daily Std Dev

CONL:

170.14%

QQQ:

17.49%

Max Drawdown

CONL:

-82.62%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CONL:

-31.95%

QQQ:

-0.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a 71.19% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 29.12% return.


CONL

YTD

71.19%

1M

-11.67%

6M

0.75%

1Y

110.52%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QQQ

YTD

29.12%

1M

2.65%

6M

10.77%

1Y

31.30%

5Y (annualized)

21.35%

10Y (annualized)

18.88%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for CONL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CONL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CONL, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.791.89
The chart of Sortino ratio for CONL, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.232.50
The chart of Omega ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.702.43
The chart of Martin ratio for CONL, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.958.82
CONL
QQQ

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.79
1.89
CONL
QQQ

Dividends

CONL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CONL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than QQQ's 0.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.58%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%1.02%

Drawdowns

CONL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -82.62%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-31.95%
-0.65%
CONL
QQQ

Volatility

CONL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 53.95% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 4.19%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
53.95%
4.19%
CONL
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab