CONL vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
CONL and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CONL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 9, 2022. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CONL or FNGU.
Correlation
The correlation between CONL and FNGU is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CONL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CONL:
-0.40
FNGU:
0.46
CONL:
0.23
FNGU:
1.23
CONL:
1.03
FNGU:
1.16
CONL:
-0.76
FNGU:
0.69
CONL:
-1.39
FNGU:
1.72
CONL:
47.97%
FNGU:
25.26%
CONL:
167.53%
FNGU:
94.04%
CONL:
-87.62%
FNGU:
-92.34%
CONL:
-77.45%
FNGU:
-45.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -45.57% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's -35.44% return.
CONL
-45.57%
7.92%
-38.15%
-62.83%
N/A
N/A
FNGU
-35.44%
-9.99%
-16.02%
33.85%
44.98%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CONL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CONL vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CONL
FNGU
CONL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CONL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CONL nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.31% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CONL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CONL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is 48.13%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 53.93%. This indicates that CONL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.