PortfoliosLab logo
COMS vs. WMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COMS and WMT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

COMS vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COMSovereign Holding Corp. (COMS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COMS:

-0.03

WMT:

2.14

Sortino Ratio

COMS:

17.62

WMT:

2.83

Omega Ratio

COMS:

4.67

WMT:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

COMS:

-0.99

WMT:

2.28

Martin Ratio

COMS:

-1.07

WMT:

7.41

Ulcer Index

COMS:

92.90%

WMT:

6.76%

Daily Std Dev

COMS:

3,476.63%

WMT:

24.03%

Max Drawdown

COMS:

-100.00%

WMT:

-77.24%

Current Drawdown

COMS:

-100.00%

WMT:

-7.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COMS:

$2.70K

WMT:

$780.73B

EPS

COMS:

-$29.15

WMT:

$2.34

PS Ratio

COMS:

0.00

WMT:

1.14

PB Ratio

COMS:

0.19

WMT:

9.28

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMS achieves a -23.08% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 8.03% return.


COMS

YTD

-23.08%

1M

0.00%

6M

-52.38%

1Y

-99.52%

3Y*

-96.17%

5Y*

-91.82%

10Y*

N/A

WMT

YTD

8.03%

1M

1.35%

6M

6.46%

1Y

51.10%

3Y*

33.15%

5Y*

20.32%

10Y*

16.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COMSovereign Holding Corp.

Walmart Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COMS vs. WMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COMS is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COMS is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COMS is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COMS is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COMS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COMS is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WMT is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WMT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WMT is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WMT is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WMT is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WMT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COMS vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COMSovereign Holding Corp. (COMS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMS and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

COMS vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

COMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COMS
COMSovereign Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.91%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.87%3.17%2.22%

Drawdowns

COMS vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMS and WMT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

COMS vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for COMSovereign Holding Corp. (COMS) is 0.00%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that COMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COMS vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between COMSovereign Holding Corp. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
250.00K
180.55B
(COMS) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items