PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COMP vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and FNGU is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

COMP vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
73.31%
57.58%
COMP
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COMP:

1.27

FNGU:

2.32

Sortino Ratio

COMP:

2.16

FNGU:

2.53

Omega Ratio

COMP:

1.25

FNGU:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

COMP:

1.02

FNGU:

2.95

Martin Ratio

COMP:

7.58

FNGU:

9.81

Ulcer Index

COMP:

11.51%

FNGU:

17.43%

Daily Std Dev

COMP:

68.12%

FNGU:

73.84%

Max Drawdown

COMP:

-90.82%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

COMP:

-70.07%

FNGU:

-7.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMP achieves a 60.37% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 175.80% return.


COMP

YTD

60.37%

1M

-11.71%

6M

73.28%

1Y

72.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

175.80%

1M

26.19%

6M

57.59%

1Y

173.88%

5Y*

60.52%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COMP vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.272.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for COMP, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.162.53
The chart of Omega ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.022.95
The chart of Martin ratio for COMP, currently valued at 7.58, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.007.589.81
COMP
FNGU

The current COMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMP and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.27
2.32
COMP
FNGU

Dividends

COMP vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMP nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COMP vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-70.07%
-7.58%
COMP
FNGU

Volatility

COMP vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compass, Inc. (COMP) is 14.78%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 22.64%. This indicates that COMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.78%
22.64%
COMP
FNGU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab