PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
COMP vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

COMP vs. FNGU

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).

FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COMP or FNGU.

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and FNGU is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

COMP vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

COMP:

147.50%

FNGU:

11.40%

Max Drawdown

COMP:

-20.99%

FNGU:

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

COMP:

-20.99%

FNGU:

-0.53%

Returns By Period

COMP

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COMP vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COMP is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COMP is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COMP is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COMP is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COMP is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COMP is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COMP vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

COMP vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMP nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COMP vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -1.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

COMP vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...