PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COMP vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and FNGU is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

COMP vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-66.45%
103.96%
COMP
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COMP:

1.74

FNGU:

2.18

Sortino Ratio

COMP:

2.65

FNGU:

2.44

Omega Ratio

COMP:

1.31

FNGU:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

COMP:

1.38

FNGU:

3.16

Martin Ratio

COMP:

10.08

FNGU:

9.19

Ulcer Index

COMP:

11.71%

FNGU:

17.72%

Daily Std Dev

COMP:

67.87%

FNGU:

74.71%

Max Drawdown

COMP:

-90.82%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

COMP:

-66.45%

FNGU:

-14.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMP achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 2.30% return.


COMP

YTD

15.56%

1M

13.04%

6M

51.57%

1Y

108.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

2.30%

1M

0.10%

6M

38.52%

1Y

137.20%

5Y*

51.21%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COMP vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COMP is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COMP is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COMP is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COMP is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COMP is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COMP is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COMP vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.742.18
The chart of Sortino ratio for COMP, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.652.44
The chart of Omega ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.311.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for COMP, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.383.16
The chart of Martin ratio for COMP, currently valued at 10.08, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.089.19
COMP
FNGU

The current COMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMP and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.74
2.18
COMP
FNGU

Dividends

COMP vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMP nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COMP vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-66.45%
-14.10%
COMP
FNGU

Volatility

COMP vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Compass, Inc. (COMP) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) have volatilities of 23.60% and 23.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
23.60%
23.86%
COMP
FNGU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab