PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COLD vs. NSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


COLDNSA
YTD Return-23.07%6.54%
1Y Return-3.83%48.88%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.81%-7.16%
5Y Return (Ann)-6.27%10.27%
Sharpe Ratio-0.241.65
Sortino Ratio-0.162.44
Omega Ratio0.981.31
Calmar Ratio-0.150.91
Martin Ratio-0.495.17
Ulcer Index12.94%9.22%
Daily Std Dev25.93%28.99%
Max Drawdown-43.13%-55.05%
Current Drawdown-37.83%-29.03%

Fundamentals


COLDNSA
Market Cap$6.51B$6.24B
EPS-$1.01$1.74
PEG Ratio4.033.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.68B$795.63M
Gross Profit (TTM)$620.93M$437.49M
EBITDA (TTM)$489.12M$422.24M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between COLD and NSA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

COLD vs. NSA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -23.07% return, which is significantly lower than NSA's 6.54% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.16%
17.10%
COLD
NSA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLD vs. NSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COLD, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.49
NSA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NSA, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NSA, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NSA, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NSA, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NSA, currently valued at 5.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.17

COLD vs. NSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the NSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and NSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.24
1.65
COLD
NSA

Dividends

COLD vs. NSA - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than NSA's 5.28% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
3.88%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
5.28%5.38%5.95%2.30%3.75%3.78%4.38%3.82%3.99%3.15%

Drawdowns

COLD vs. NSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum NSA drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and NSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-37.83%
-29.03%
COLD
NSA

Volatility

COLD vs. NSA - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) at 7.75%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.05%
7.75%
COLD
NSA

Financials

COLD vs. NSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and National Storage Affiliates Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items