PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COHN vs. MRCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COHN vs. MRCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) and Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COHN

1D
1.06%
1M
-18.72%
YTD
-44.20%
6M
-22.23%
1Y
73.40%
3Y*
55.39%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
12.39%

MRCC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COHN vs. MRCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COHN
Cohen & Company Inc.
-44.20%149.46%73.42%-9.69%-36.73%-6.90%313.54%-50.28%13.71%-25.78%
MRCC
Monroe Capital Corporation
-8.19%-14.59%36.74%-5.68%-15.37%53.23%-15.17%27.79%-22.10%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between COHN and MRCC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COHN:

$69.66M

MRCC:

$110.06M

EPS

COHN:

$2.58

MRCC:

$0.53

PE Ratio

COHN:

4.42

MRCC:

9.65

PEG Ratio

COHN:

0.03

MRCC:

0.01

PS Ratio

COHN:

0.23

MRCC:

3.55

PB Ratio

COHN:

1.35

MRCC:

0.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

COHN:

$304.73M

MRCC:

$31.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

COHN:

$144.52M

MRCC:

$1.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

COHN:

$48.21M

MRCC:

-$2.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COHN vs. MRCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COHN
COHN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
COHN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
COHN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MRCC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COHN vs. MRCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) and Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COHNMRCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

COHN vs. MRCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COHNMRCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

Drawdowns

COHN vs. MRCC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COHNMRCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.62%

Volatility

COHN vs. MRCC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COHNMRCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.63%

Dividends

COHN vs. MRCC - Dividend Comparison

COHN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.43%, more than MRCC's 26.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COHN
Cohen & Company Inc.
32.43%4.24%9.66%15.04%20.98%3.38%0.00%10.13%9.49%12.47%6.72%6.98%
MRCC
Monroe Capital Corporation
26.97%14.60%11.76%14.15%11.71%8.91%13.70%12.89%14.58%10.18%9.10%10.70%

Financials

COHN vs. MRCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Company Inc. and Monroe Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
57.90M
18.21M
(COHN) Total Revenue
(MRCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COHN vs. MRCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cohen & Company Inc. and Monroe Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.5%
0
Portfolio components
COHN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Company Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.54M and revenue of 57.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.5%.

MRCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monroe Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COHN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Company Inc. reported an operating income of 5.13M and revenue of 57.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%.

MRCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monroe Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 18.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

COHN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Company Inc. reported a net income of 1.49M and revenue of 57.90M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

MRCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monroe Capital Corporation reported a net income of 13.88M and revenue of 18.21M, resulting in a net margin of 76.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COHN and MRCC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COHN and MRCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer