PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CODA vs. MRCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CODA vs. MRCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) and Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CODA achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than MRCY's 33.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CODA has outperformed MRCY with an annualized return of 17.86%, while MRCY has yielded a comparatively lower 14.20% annualized return.


CODA

1D
-0.49%
1M
5.41%
6M
-4.79%
YTD
9.03%
1Y
41.23%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
17.86%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

MRCY

1D
1.18%
1M
-23.06%
6M
3.43%
YTD
33.00%
1Y
86.12%
3Y*
36.79%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
14.20%
ALL TIME*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$808.23K$911.57K$1.44M
$54.38M$61.77M$74.15M

CODA vs. MRCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
9.03%18.77%30.07%-12.24%-14.25%27.19%-24.85%43.81%21.96%94.00%
MRCY
Mercury Systems, Inc.
33.00%73.83%14.85%-18.26%-18.74%-37.47%27.42%46.14%-7.91%69.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CODA and MRCY is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2008

0.09

Over the past year, CODA and MRCY have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CODA:

$114.39M

MRCY:

$5.83B

EPS

CODA:

$0.44

MRCY:

-$0.24

PS Ratio

CODA:

4.09

MRCY:

5.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

CODA:

$27.95M

MRCY:

$966.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CODA:

$18.68M

MRCY:

$277.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

CODA:

$7.80M

MRCY:

-$12.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CODA vs. MRCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CODA
CODA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CODA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CODA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CODA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CODA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CODA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MRCY
MRCY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MRCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRCY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MRCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRCY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CODA vs. MRCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) and Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CODAMRCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.64

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

6.05

-4.41

CODA vs. MRCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CODA Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the MRCY Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CODA and MRCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CODA vs. MRCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CODA drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, roughly equal to the maximum MRCY drawdown of -95.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CODA and MRCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CODAMRCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.44%

-95.95%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.87%

-32.19%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.87%

-35.04%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.14%

-62.43%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.78%

-71.73%

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.55%

-23.06%

-23.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.01%

-53.56%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.03%

14.03%

+8.00%

Volatility

CODA vs. MRCY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) is 8.06%, while Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) has a volatility of 21.71%. This indicates that CODA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CODAMRCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

21.71%

-13.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.58%

48.77%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.99%

61.26%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.57%

47.46%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.31%

44.75%

+19.56%

Dividends

CODA vs. MRCY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CODA nor MRCY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CODA vs. MRCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coda Octopus Group, Inc. and Mercury Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CODA vs. MRCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coda Octopus Group, Inc. and Mercury Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CODA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.58M and revenue of 6.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.

MRCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.05M and revenue of 235.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

CODA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.79M and revenue of 6.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.

MRCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

CODA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.70M and revenue of 6.90M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.

MRCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -2.86M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CODA and MRCY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRCY has higher volatility (21.71%) compared to CODA (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CODA dropped -99.44% vs MRCY's -95.95%.

MRCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CODA and MRCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer