CNYA vs. SMIN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN).
CNYA and SMIN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. SMIN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI India Small Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. Both CNYA and SMIN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNYA or SMIN.
Performance
CNYA vs. SMIN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNYA having a 13.42% return and SMIN slightly lower at 13.28%.
CNYA
13.42%
-0.78%
6.65%
10.29%
2.14%
N/A
SMIN
13.28%
-8.36%
4.14%
20.46%
18.40%
9.76%
Key characteristics
| CNYA | SMIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.30 | 1.19 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.66 | 1.52 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.19 | 2.02 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.99 | 6.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.53% | 3.13% |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.78% | 17.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.49% | -60.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -35.88% | -9.10% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNYA vs. SMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIN's 0.76% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CNYA and SMIN is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNYA vs. SMIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNYA vs. SMIN - Dividend Comparison
CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SMIN's 0.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 3.79% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.98% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | 0.31% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 1.27% | 1.07% | 1.74% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 2.30% | 0.93% | 0.34% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
CNYA vs. SMIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum SMIN drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and SMIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNYA vs. SMIN - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) at 5.48%. This indicates that CNYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.