PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNXT vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CNXTVUG
YTD Return25.62%25.99%
1Y Return19.76%39.41%
3Y Return (Ann)-14.36%7.35%
5Y Return (Ann)3.17%18.66%
10Y Return (Ann)1.61%15.38%
Sharpe Ratio0.452.41
Sortino Ratio1.093.11
Omega Ratio1.171.44
Calmar Ratio0.343.10
Martin Ratio1.4312.26
Ulcer Index16.10%3.28%
Daily Std Dev50.49%16.71%
Max Drawdown-68.98%-50.68%
Current Drawdown-48.59%-1.54%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CNXT and VUG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CNXT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CNXT having a 25.62% return and VUG slightly higher at 25.99%. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 1.61%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
28.32%
14.10%
CNXT
VUG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNXT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.


CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
Expense ratio chart for CNXT: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for VUG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNXT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNXT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNXT, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNXT, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNXT, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNXT, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNXT, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.43
VUG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VUG, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VUG, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VUG, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VUG, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VUG, currently valued at 12.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.26

CNXT vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.45
2.41
CNXT
VUG

Dividends

CNXT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

CNXT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%9.23%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.50%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%1.19%

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-48.59%
-1.54%
CNXT
VUG

Volatility

CNXT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 30.75% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 4.56%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.75%
4.56%
CNXT
VUG