PortfoliosLab logo
CNSWF vs. ARES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNSWF and ARES is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNSWF vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNSWF:

1.23

ARES:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

CNSWF:

1.69

ARES:

0.82

Omega Ratio

CNSWF:

1.21

ARES:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CNSWF:

2.11

ARES:

0.44

Martin Ratio

CNSWF:

6.23

ARES:

1.41

Ulcer Index

CNSWF:

4.98%

ARES:

12.57%

Daily Std Dev

CNSWF:

27.53%

ARES:

41.13%

Max Drawdown

CNSWF:

-30.21%

ARES:

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

CNSWF:

-2.36%

ARES:

-15.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNSWF:

$76.79B

ARES:

$53.85B

EPS

CNSWF:

$35.15

ARES:

$1.71

PE Ratio

CNSWF:

103.09

ARES:

96.43

PEG Ratio

CNSWF:

3.46

ARES:

0.63

PS Ratio

CNSWF:

7.41

ARES:

12.62

PB Ratio

CNSWF:

24.63

ARES:

12.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNSWF:

$10.37B

ARES:

$4.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNSWF:

$7.87B

ARES:

$2.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNSWF:

$2.62B

ARES:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNSWF achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSWF has outperformed ARES with an annualized return of 34.87%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively lower 29.27% annualized return.


CNSWF

YTD

16.97%

1M

0.68%

6M

8.13%

1Y

33.52%

3Y*

66.81%

5Y*

45.36%

10Y*

34.87%

ARES

YTD

-5.78%

1M

8.50%

6M

-5.14%

1Y

18.82%

3Y*

36.63%

5Y*

38.71%

10Y*

29.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Constellation Software Inc

Ares Management Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNSWF vs. ARES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNSWF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNSWF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNSWF is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNSWF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNSWF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNSWF is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNSWF is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARES is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARES is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARES is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARES is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARES is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARES is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNSWF vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNSWF Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNSWF and ARES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CNSWF vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

CNSWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ARES's 2.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNSWF
Constellation Software Inc
0.11%0.13%0.16%0.51%0.43%0.61%4.93%1.25%1.32%1.75%1.91%2.69%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
2.36%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%

Drawdowns

CNSWF vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNSWF drawdown since its inception was -30.21%, smaller than the maximum ARES drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSWF and ARES.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CNSWF vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) is 6.24%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that CNSWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNSWF vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.65B
1.09B
(CNSWF) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNSWF vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellation Software Inc and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
88.9%
39.7%
(CNSWF) Gross Margin
(ARES) Gross Margin
CNSWF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc reported a gross profit of 2.36B and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.9%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 431.68M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

CNSWF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc reported an operating income of 434.00M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 67.52M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

CNSWF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 123.50M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.