CNQ vs. LMT

In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 10.91%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than LMT's 2.36% yield.

The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.11%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.38%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.