PortfoliosLab logo
CNQ vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ and LMT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNQ vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNQ:

-0.50

LMT:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

CNQ:

-0.42

LMT:

0.66

Omega Ratio

CNQ:

0.95

LMT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CNQ:

-0.39

LMT:

0.30

Martin Ratio

CNQ:

-0.96

LMT:

0.56

Ulcer Index

CNQ:

14.48%

LMT:

16.70%

Daily Std Dev

CNQ:

31.74%

LMT:

23.46%

Max Drawdown

CNQ:

-81.12%

LMT:

-70.23%

Current Drawdown

CNQ:

-21.35%

LMT:

-20.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNQ:

$64.51B

LMT:

$112.19B

EPS

CNQ:

$2.57

LMT:

$23.20

PE Ratio

CNQ:

11.99

LMT:

20.64

PEG Ratio

CNQ:

12.75

LMT:

1.75

PS Ratio

CNQ:

1.68

LMT:

1.56

PB Ratio

CNQ:

2.19

LMT:

16.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNQ:

$43.23B

LMT:

$71.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNQ:

$12.09B

LMT:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNQ:

$18.38B

LMT:

$9.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's -0.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNQ having a 12.57% annualized return and LMT not far ahead at 12.69%.


CNQ

YTD

1.19%

1M

6.24%

6M

-5.82%

1Y

-15.73%

3Y*

2.22%

5Y*

31.66%

10Y*

12.57%

LMT

YTD

-0.05%

1M

1.97%

6M

-6.66%

1Y

5.19%

3Y*

5.41%

5Y*

6.38%

10Y*

12.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lockheed Martin Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNQ vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNQ is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNQ vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CNQ vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than LMT's 3.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
5.09%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.70%5.15%3.42%5.92%2.34%2.20%3.24%2.60%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
3.38%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%

Drawdowns

CNQ vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.12%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and LMT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CNQ vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 6.53%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNQ vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
12.71B
17.96B
(CNQ) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNQ vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
28.0%
12.9%
(CNQ) Gross Margin
(LMT) Gross Margin
CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 12.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 17.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 3.29B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.