CNQ vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNQ or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and LMT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CNQ vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CNQ:
-0.11
LMT:
0.79
CNQ:
0.03
LMT:
1.18
CNQ:
1.00
LMT:
1.17
CNQ:
-0.11
LMT:
0.62
CNQ:
-0.25
LMT:
2.07
CNQ:
11.89%
LMT:
6.47%
CNQ:
26.43%
LMT:
16.98%
CNQ:
-81.11%
LMT:
-70.23%
CNQ:
-25.54%
LMT:
-19.94%
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$64.77B
LMT:
$116.29B
CNQ:
$2.47
LMT:
$27.63
CNQ:
12.39
LMT:
17.76
CNQ:
12.75
LMT:
4.02
CNQ:
$37.25B
LMT:
$71.30B
CNQ:
$10.84B
LMT:
$8.62B
CNQ:
$17.12B
LMT:
$10.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 11.56%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
CNQ
-5.45%
-11.35%
-12.11%
-4.53%
19.97%
11.56%
LMT
10.72%
-7.97%
5.82%
12.01%
7.68%
12.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNQ vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNQ vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than LMT's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 5.22% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.70% | 5.15% | 3.42% | 5.92% | 2.34% | 2.19% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 1.62% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.61% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.11%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNQ vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.60%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNQ vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities