CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNQ.TO or FRU.TO.
Key characteristics
CNQ.TO | FRU.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 6.01% | 8.39% |
1Y Return | 7.72% | 0.77% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 30.24% | 21.40% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 20.89% | 20.33% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.01% | 1.23% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.24 | 0.01 |
Daily Std Dev | 26.06% | 20.34% |
Max Drawdown | -79.68% | -86.95% |
Current Drawdown | -18.71% | -7.59% |
Fundamentals
CNQ.TO | FRU.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$95.15B | CA$2.12B |
EPS | CA$3.52 | CA$1.00 |
PE Ratio | 12.70 | 14.10 |
PEG Ratio | 0.33 | -2.97 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$38.61B | CA$323.04M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$11.86B | CA$221.30M |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$17.72B | CA$291.89M |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ.TO and FRU.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNQ.TO achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly lower than FRU.TO's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ.TO has outperformed FRU.TO with an annualized return of 8.01%, while FRU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FRU.TO's 7.66% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.49% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Freehold Royalties Ltd. | 7.66% | 7.89% | 6.13% | 4.21% | 5.71% | 8.64% | 7.56% | 4.13% | 3.81% | 9.21% | 8.79% | 7.60% |
Drawdowns
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.68%, smaller than the maximum FRU.TO drawdown of -86.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ.TO and FRU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) at 5.68%. This indicates that CNQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNQ.TO vs. FRU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Freehold Royalties Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities