CNP vs. TMUS
CNP (CenterPoint Energy, Inc.) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. CNP operates in Utilities - Regulated Gas (Utilities), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, CNP returned 9.54%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNP vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 9.54%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.83% annualized return.
CNP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 13.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
TMUS
- 1D
- -3.91%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -9.72%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- -24.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
CNP vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 9.54% | 23.74% | 14.28% | -2.12% | 10.00% | 32.41% | -17.98% | 0.61% | 3.70% | 19.58% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -9.72% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNP and TMUS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2007 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
CNP:
$27.37B
TMUS:
$199.97B
CNP:
$1.63
TMUS:
$9.41
CNP:
25.45
TMUS:
19.28
CNP:
2.90
TMUS:
2.25
CNP:
2.39
TMUS:
3.58
CNP:
$9.41B
TMUS:
$90.53B
CNP:
$3.89B
TMUS:
$34.92B
CNP:
$3.81B
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNP vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
CNP
TMUS
CNP vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNP | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.85 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | -0.85 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | -1.40 | +6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNP | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.97 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.24 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.61 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
CNP vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -89.94%, roughly equal to the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNP | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.94% | -86.29% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -28.62% | +21.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -31.99% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.81% | -31.99% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.80% | -31.99% | -27.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -31.99% | +26.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | -25.95% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 17.33% | -14.43% |
Volatility
CNP vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) is 5.99%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that CNP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNP | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.53% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 19.07% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 24.92% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 23.85% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 26.07% | -0.21% |
Dividends
CNP vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, which matches TMUS's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 2.17% | 2.30% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 2.33% | 2.33% | 3.42% | 4.22% | 3.93% | 3.77% | 4.18% | 5.39% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.17% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNP vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNP vs. TMUS - Profitability Comparison
CNP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CNP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 658.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
CNP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 316.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNP and TMUS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to CNP (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNP dropped -89.94% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
CNP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNP and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer