PortfoliosLab logo
CNMD vs. QSIAW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNMD and QSIAW is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CONMED Corporation (CNMD) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNMD:

-0.47

QSIAW:

1.22

Sortino Ratio

CNMD:

-0.48

QSIAW:

3.61

Omega Ratio

CNMD:

0.94

QSIAW:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

CNMD:

-0.29

QSIAW:

2.42

Martin Ratio

CNMD:

-1.23

QSIAW:

4.07

Ulcer Index

CNMD:

16.14%

QSIAW:

58.78%

Daily Std Dev

CNMD:

42.31%

QSIAW:

304.25%

Max Drawdown

CNMD:

-76.45%

QSIAW:

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

CNMD:

-60.71%

QSIAW:

-81.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNMD:

$1.85B

QSIAW:

$1.44B

PS Ratio

CNMD:

1.41

QSIAW:

0.00

PB Ratio

CNMD:

1.91

QSIAW:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNMD:

$1.32B

QSIAW:

$3.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNMD:

$730.24M

QSIAW:

$1.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNMD:

$235.50M

QSIAW:

-$106.79M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNMD achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly higher than QSIAW's -37.60% return.


CNMD

YTD

-12.27%

1M

23.15%

6M

-16.07%

1Y

-19.61%

3Y*

-18.21%

5Y*

-3.06%

10Y*

1.94%

QSIAW

YTD

-37.60%

1M

132.84%

6M

1,366.17%

1Y

333.33%

3Y*

2.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONMED Corporation

Quantum-Si incorporated

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNMD vs. QSIAW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNMD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNMD is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNMD is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNMD is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNMD is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNMD is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNMD is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QSIAW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QSIAW is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QSIAW is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QSIAW is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QSIAW is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QSIAW is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QSIAW is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CONMED Corporation (CNMD) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the QSIAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNMD and QSIAW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Dividend Comparison

CNMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while QSIAW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNMD
CONMED Corporation
1.34%1.17%0.73%0.90%0.56%0.71%0.72%1.25%1.57%1.81%1.82%1.78%
QSIAW
Quantum-Si incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNMD drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, smaller than the maximum QSIAW drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNMD and QSIAW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is 18.07%, while Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW) has a volatility of 70.84%. This indicates that CNMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSIAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNMD vs. QSIAW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CONMED Corporation and Quantum-Si incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
321.26M
842.00K
(CNMD) Total Revenue
(QSIAW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items