CNM vs. WSM
CNM (Core & Main, Inc.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. CNM operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, CNM returned 16.74%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for WSM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNM vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNM achieves a -16.55% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 25.12% return.
CNM
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- 6M
- -23.72%
- YTD
- -16.55%
- 1Y
- -31.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.76%
WSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 53.28%
- 5Y*
- 25.78%
- 10Y*
- 26.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.01%
CNM vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | -16.55% | 2.08% | 25.98% | 109.27% | -36.35% | 51.70% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 25.12% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNM and WSM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CNM and WSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CNM:
$8.12B
WSM:
$26.04B
CNM:
$3.02
WSM:
$8.93
CNM:
14.35
WSM:
24.77
CNM:
0.23
WSM:
5.01
CNM:
0.84
WSM:
3.42
CNM:
$7.65B
WSM:
$7.88B
CNM:
$2.07B
WSM:
$3.63B
CNM:
$909.00M
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNM vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
CNM
WSM
CNM vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNM | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.30 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 2.92 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNM vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNM drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNM and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNM | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.00% | -89.01% | +49.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.25% | -23.27% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.74% | -36.79% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.00% | -51.92% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.25% | -7.62% | -27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -24.98% | +7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.66% | 10.36% | +12.30% |
Volatility
CNM vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 8.19%. This indicates that CNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNM | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 8.19% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.04% | 25.34% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.93% | 34.57% | +6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.64% | 44.79% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.64% | 44.22% | -3.58% |
Dividends
CNM vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
CNM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
CNM vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core & Main, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNM vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
CNM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a gross profit of 520.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
CNM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported an operating income of 177.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
CNM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a net income of 108.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNM and WSM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNM has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to WSM (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNM dropped -40.00% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNM and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer