PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNKY.L vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CNKY.LGLD
YTD Return6.94%24.30%
1Y Return12.40%30.48%
3Y Return (Ann)1.64%10.88%
5Y Return (Ann)4.60%11.49%
10Y Return (Ann)8.73%7.59%
Sharpe Ratio0.662.14
Sortino Ratio1.002.86
Omega Ratio1.131.37
Calmar Ratio0.764.10
Martin Ratio1.7913.62
Ulcer Index6.23%2.32%
Daily Std Dev16.95%14.79%
Max Drawdown-23.61%-45.56%
Current Drawdown-7.25%-7.72%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CNKY.L and GLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNKY.L achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 24.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CNKY.L has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.73%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.68%
7.58%
CNKY.L
GLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNKY.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNKY.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
Expense ratio chart for CNKY.L: current value at 0.48% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.48%
Expense ratio chart for GLD: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNKY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.26
GLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLD, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLD, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLD, currently valued at 11.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.98

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNKY.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.68
1.92
CNKY.L
GLD

Dividends

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNKY.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNKY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNKY.L and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.01%
-7.72%
CNKY.L
GLD

Volatility

CNKY.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.25%
5.47%
CNKY.L
GLD