CNK vs. IRDM

In the year-to-date period, CNK achieves a 118.81% return, which is significantly higher than IRDM's -27.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CNK has underperformed IRDM with an annualized return of 0.13%, while IRDM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CNK Sharpe Ratio is 3.64, which is higher than the IRDM Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNK and IRDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.

The maximum CNK drawdown since its inception was -83.79%, which is greater than IRDM's maximum drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNK and IRDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) at 8.98%. This indicates that CNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Iridium Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.