PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNK vs. FUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNK vs. FUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNK achieves a 58.47% return, which is significantly higher than FUN's 12.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CNK has outperformed FUN with an annualized return of 1.50%, while FUN has yielded a comparatively lower -8.60% annualized return.


CNK

1D
1.22%
1M
16.05%
6M
55.52%
YTD
58.47%
1Y
43.27%
3Y*
30.07%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
1.50%
ALL TIME*
6.31%

FUN

1D
-2.09%
1M
-17.44%
6M
-3.78%
YTD
12.97%
1Y
-41.63%
3Y*
-22.07%
5Y*
-14.78%
10Y*
-8.60%
ALL TIME*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$102.97M$89.37M$73.61M
$31.14M$38.24M$46.37M

CNK vs. FUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
58.47%-24.07%119.87%62.70%-46.28%-7.41%-47.79%-1.90%6.36%-6.39%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
12.97%-68.17%26.39%-0.96%-16.23%27.25%-27.49%25.65%-22.66%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CNK and FUN is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007

0.28

The correlation between CNK and FUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNK:

$4.27B

FUN:

$1.77B

EPS

CNK:

$0.69

FUN:

-$16.04

PS Ratio

CNK:

1.29

FUN:

0.61

PB Ratio

CNK:

8.61

FUN:

0.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNK:

$3.36B

FUN:

$2.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNK:

$316.50M

FUN:

$1.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNK:

$474.40M

FUN:

-$733.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNK vs. FUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNK
CNK Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FUN
FUN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNK vs. FUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNKFUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.73

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

-1.10

+4.29

CNK vs. FUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNK Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the FUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNK and FUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNK vs. FUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNK drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than FUN's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNK and FUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNKFUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.80%

-77.75%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.65%

-58.21%

+30.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.38%

-77.74%

+39.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.23%

-77.74%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.80%

-77.75%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-69.93%

+61.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-20.02%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

38.37%

-26.37%

Volatility

CNK vs. FUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) is 10.49%, while Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that CNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNKFUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

15.40%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.29%

46.34%

-20.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

68.05%

-27.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.30%

44.64%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.04%

45.59%

+10.45%

Dividends

CNK vs. FUN - Dividend Comparison

CNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
0.96%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.07%4.02%3.58%3.33%2.82%2.99%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%

Financials

CNK vs. FUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Cedar Fair, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CNK and FUN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUN has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to CNK (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNK dropped -83.80% vs FUN's -77.75%.

CNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNK and FUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer