PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNDX.AS vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CNDX.ASVOO
YTD Return30.08%27.15%
1Y Return37.83%39.90%
3Y Return (Ann)12.10%10.28%
5Y Return (Ann)21.43%16.00%
10Y Return (Ann)19.63%13.43%
Sharpe Ratio2.153.15
Sortino Ratio2.844.19
Omega Ratio1.401.59
Calmar Ratio2.624.60
Martin Ratio8.8021.00
Ulcer Index4.04%1.85%
Daily Std Dev16.46%12.34%
Max Drawdown-31.21%-33.99%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CNDX.AS and VOO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a 30.08% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.AS has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.63%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.37%
15.64%
CNDX.AS
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for CNDX.AS: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNDX.AS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNDX.AS, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNDX.AS, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNDX.AS, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNDX.AS, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNDX.AS, currently valued at 9.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.60
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 18.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.71

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.AS and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.09
2.86
CNDX.AS
VOO

Dividends

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.01%
0
CNDX.AS
VOO

Volatility

CNDX.AS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.95%. This indicates that CNDX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.63%
3.95%
CNDX.AS
VOO