PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNC vs. HUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNC vs. HUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centene Corporation (CNC) and Humana Inc. (HUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNC achieves a 51.20% return, which is significantly higher than HUM's 43.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CNC has underperformed HUM with an annualized return of 6.10%, while HUM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


CNC

1D
2.27%
1M
-8.31%
6M
43.63%
YTD
51.20%
1Y
140.14%
3Y*
-2.92%
5Y*
-1.94%
10Y*
6.10%
ALL TIME*
17.43%

HUM

1D
-0.76%
1M
-8.29%
6M
87.79%
YTD
43.12%
1Y
49.28%
3Y*
-6.26%
5Y*
-2.12%
10Y*
8.85%
ALL TIME*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$363.88M$313.77M$329.35M
$603.25M$586.13M$541.90M

CNC vs. HUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNC
Centene Corporation
51.20%-32.07%-18.37%-9.51%-0.47%37.26%-4.52%9.05%14.29%78.52%
HUM
Humana Inc.
43.12%2.36%-43.96%-9.94%11.15%13.80%12.71%28.94%16.27%22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CNC and HUM is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001

0.46

The correlation between CNC and HUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNC:

$30.74B

HUM:

$43.67B

EPS

CNC:

-$10.32

HUM:

$10.59

PS Ratio

CNC:

0.16

HUM:

0.30

PB Ratio

CNC:

1.37

HUM:

2.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNC:

$193.73B

HUM:

$145.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNC:

$31.24B

HUM:

$19.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNC:

-$2.89B

HUM:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNC vs. HUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNC
CNC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HUM
HUM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNC vs. HUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centene Corporation (CNC) and Humana Inc. (HUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNCHUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.22

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

1.02

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

2.11

+11.26

CNC vs. HUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNC Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the HUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNC and HUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNC vs. HUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNC drawdown since its inception was -74.07%, smaller than the maximum HUM drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNC and HUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCHUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.07%

-85.10%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.73%

-47.18%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.65%

-67.92%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.07%

-69.92%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

-69.92%

-4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.00%

-32.62%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-27.16%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.41%

22.72%

-12.31%

Volatility

CNC vs. HUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Centene Corporation (CNC) is 10.07%, while Humana Inc. (HUM) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that CNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNCHUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

10.96%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.87%

30.16%

+5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.87%

48.41%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.85%

37.77%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.58%

34.49%

+4.09%

Dividends

CNC vs. HUM - Dividend Comparison

CNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNC
Centene Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUM
Humana Inc.
0.97%1.38%1.40%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%

Financials

CNC vs. HUM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centene Corporation and Humana Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CNC vs. HUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Centene Corporation and Humana Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Centene Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.62B and revenue of 44.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.4%.

HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.50B and revenue of 40.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.5%.

CNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Centene Corporation reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 44.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 1.36B and revenue of 40.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

CNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Centene Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 44.38B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 40.87B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNC and HUM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUM has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to CNC (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNC dropped -74.07% vs HUM's -85.10%.

CNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNC and HUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer