CNC vs. ELV

In the year-to-date period, CNC achieves a -19.84% return, which is significantly higher than ELV's -21.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CNC has underperformed ELV with an annualized return of 8.37%, while ELV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centene Corporation (CNC) and Elevance Health Inc (ELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CNC Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the ELV Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNC and ELV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

The maximum CNC drawdown since its inception was -64.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ELV drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNC and ELV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Centene Corporation (CNC) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Elevance Health Inc (ELV) at 7.20%. This indicates that CNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centene Corporation and Elevance Health Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.