CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE) and Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE).
CN1G.DE and XNZN.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN1G.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Nordic Countries. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. XNZN.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. Both CN1G.DE and XNZN.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CN1G.DE or XNZN.DE.
Key characteristics
| CN1G.DE | XNZN.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.96% | 7.32% |
| 1Y Return | 13.65% | 24.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.95 | 1.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.42 | 2.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.22 | 2.39 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.33 | 7.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.83% | 2.66% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.49% | 14.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.36% | -13.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.02% | -7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN1G.DE and XNZN.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CN1G.DE achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than XNZN.DE's 7.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN1G.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNZN.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE) and Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CN1G.DE nor XNZN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CN1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.36%, which is greater than XNZN.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CN1G.DE and XNZN.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CN1G.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CN1G.DE) is 3.76%, while Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that CN1G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNZN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.