CMPGY vs. YUM

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Compass Group PLC ADR (CMPGY) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM).

Performance

CMPGY vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass Group PLC ADR (CMPGY) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMPGY vs. YUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMPGY Compass Group PLC ADR	-7.26%	-2.98%	23.21%	21.71%	2.19%	23.17%	-24.79%	23.34%	-2.91%	22.13%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	3.66%	14.94%	4.72%	3.93%	-5.99%	30.05%	9.85%	11.41%	14.61%	31.09%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) CMPGY : $78.44B YUM : $8.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) CMPGY : $14.18B YUM : $2.67B
EBITDA (TTM) CMPGY : $6.99B YUM : $2.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPGY achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPGY has underperformed YUM with an annualized return of 6.98%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.

CMPGY

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -7.26%
• 6M: -13.41%
• 1Y: -11.82%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 6.98%

YUM

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 0.55%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 12.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMPGY vs. YUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPGY

CMPGY Risk / Return Rank: 21
CMPGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CMPGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CMPGY Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CMPGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CMPGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22

YUM

YUM Risk / Return Rank: 37
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 32
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPGY vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass Group PLC ADR (CMPGY) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMPGY	YUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	0.02	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.53	0.19	-0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.02	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	0.01	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	0.01	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMPGY vs. YUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPGY and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMPGY	YUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	0.02	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.46	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.54	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.49	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CMPGY and YUM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMPGY vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

CMPGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than YUM's 1.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMPGY Compass Group PLC ADR	2.25%	1.93%	1.68%	1.64%	1.30%	0.00%	1.88%	1.81%	2.05%	7.37%	4.34%	2.21%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	1.85%	1.88%	2.00%	1.85%	1.78%	1.44%	1.73%	1.67%	1.57%	1.47%	41.26%	2.31%

Drawdowns

CMPGY vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPGY drawdown since its inception was -57.36%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPGY and YUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMPGY	YUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.36%	-67.69%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.30%	-13.88%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.30%	-23.10%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.36%	-52.17%	-5.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.32%	-7.18%	-11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-12.41%	+2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.51%	7.83%	+2.68%

Volatility

CMPGY vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

Compass Group PLC ADR (CMPGY) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 5.79%. This indicates that CMPGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMPGY	YUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	5.79%	+5.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.64%	15.96%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.97%	23.01%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.11%	20.20%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.57%	22.64%	+5.93%

Financials

CMPGY vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Compass Group PLC ADR and YUM! Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CMPGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group PLC ADR reported a gross profit of -9.62B and revenue of 28.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -33.6%.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMPGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group PLC ADR reported an operating income of 1.93B and revenue of 28.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 738.00M and revenue of 2.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

CMPGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group PLC ADR reported a net income of 951.68M and revenue of 28.63B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.51B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.