CMNWX vs. XLK
CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both funds - CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX returned 15.51%/yr vs 26.01%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMNWX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
CMNWX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 15.51%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.01% annualized return.
CMNWX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 32.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.53%
- 10Y*
- 26.01%
CMNWX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | 9.31% | 13.27% | 32.14% | 25.01% | -16.37% | 27.45% | 18.36% | 32.21% | -4.12% | 20.64% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.79% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMNWX and XLK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CMNWX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMNWX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CMNWX
XLK
CMNWX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMNWX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 3.84 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | 12.30 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMNWX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMNWX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -82.05% | +31.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -15.92% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -25.66% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -33.56% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.26% | -33.56% | +0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -2.94% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -34.90% | +27.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 4.96% | -2.99% |
Volatility
CMNWX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) is 4.91%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that CMNWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMNWX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 11.64% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 19.23% | -8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 23.12% | -10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 25.30% | -8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 24.71% | -7.48% |
CMNWX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMNWX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than XLK's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | 8.00% | 8.75% | 10.03% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 9.52% | 5.33% | 8.37% | 46.60% | 7.72% | 10.32% | 5.42% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMNWX and XLK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to CMNWX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMNWX and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer