CMNWX vs. PMYYX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) and PMYYX (Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX returned 15.51%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for PMYYX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CMNWX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for PMYYX.

Performance

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly higher than PMYYX's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has underperformed PMYYX with an annualized return of 15.51%, while PMYYX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.

CMNWX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 9.31%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 24.02%
• 3Y*: 21.81%
• 5Y*: 14.55%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

PMYYX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 6M: 7.06%
• 1Y: 25.46%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 16.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	9.31%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%
PMYYX Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund	7.62%	17.33%	26.46%	27.98%	-15.94%	30.93%	17.69%	32.52%	-7.91%	24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and PMYYX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.95

The correlation between CMNWX and PMYYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. PMYYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 49
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PMYYX

PMYYX Risk / Return Rank: 53
PMYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PMYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PMYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PMYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PMYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMNWX	PMYYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.02	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.77	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.53	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	10.93	+1.07

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the PMYYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and PMYYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than PMYYX's maximum drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PMYYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNWX	PMYYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.43%	-35.25%	-15.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-10.02%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.54%	-18.92%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-23.52%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.26%	-35.25%	+1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-1.03%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-4.11%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.31%	-0.34%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX) at 4.50%. This indicates that CMNWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMYYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMNWX	PMYYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	4.50%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	9.88%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	12.51%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	16.89%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	18.43%	-1.20%

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PMYYX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNWX vs. PMYYX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than PMYYX's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	8.00%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PMYYX Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund	2.57%	2.76%	4.47%	2.62%	5.26%	9.25%	2.41%	4.76%	2.36%	2.71%	1.21%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNWX and PMYYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CMNWX and PMYYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CMNWX or PMYYX?

CMNWX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to PMYYX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs PMYYX's -35.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.