PortfoliosLab logo
CMI vs. XLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMI and XLU is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

CMI vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6,818.10%
563.09%
CMI
XLU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMI:

0.29

XLU:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

CMI:

0.63

XLU:

1.72

Omega Ratio

CMI:

1.08

XLU:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

CMI:

0.29

XLU:

2.04

Martin Ratio

CMI:

0.91

XLU:

5.21

Ulcer Index

CMI:

9.70%

XLU:

4.12%

Daily Std Dev

CMI:

30.33%

XLU:

17.24%

Max Drawdown

CMI:

-75.66%

XLU:

-52.27%

Current Drawdown

CMI:

-21.33%

XLU:

-2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a -12.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 11.03%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


CMI

YTD

-12.87%

1M

8.89%

6M

-6.26%

1Y

10.02%

5Y*

17.50%

10Y*

11.03%

XLU

YTD

5.85%

1M

6.74%

6M

4.64%

1Y

19.84%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

9.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMI vs. XLU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMI is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMI is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMI is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMI is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMI is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMI is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLU is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLU is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLU is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLU is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLU is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLU is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMI vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMI, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CMI: 0.29
XLU: 1.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMI, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CMI: 0.63
XLU: 1.72
The chart of Omega ratio for CMI, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CMI: 1.08
XLU: 1.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMI, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CMI: 0.29
XLU: 2.04
The chart of Martin ratio for CMI, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
CMI: 0.91
XLU: 5.21

The current CMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMI and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.29
1.25
CMI
XLU

Dividends

CMI vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than XLU's 2.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMI
Cummins Inc.
2.36%2.01%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%1.95%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.86%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%3.19%

Drawdowns

CMI vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and XLU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-21.33%
-2.59%
CMI
XLU

Volatility

CMI vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a higher volatility of 15.30% compared to Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) at 8.73%. This indicates that CMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.30%
8.73%
CMI
XLU