CMF vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
CMF and SPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993. Both CMF and SPY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMF or SPY.
Performance
CMF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMF achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 24.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CMF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 1.99%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.
CMF
1.48%
-0.27%
2.17%
5.45%
0.81%
1.99%
SPY
24.40%
0.59%
11.33%
31.86%
15.23%
13.04%
Key characteristics
CMF | SPY | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.55 | 2.64 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.22 | 3.53 |
Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.49 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.83 | 3.81 |
Martin Ratio | 6.68 | 17.21 |
Ulcer Index | 0.89% | 1.86% |
Daily Std Dev | 3.82% | 12.15% |
Max Drawdown | -16.45% | -55.19% |
Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -2.17% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between CMF and SPY is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than SPY's 1.20% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.74% | 2.28% | 1.74% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% | 2.80% | 3.11% |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.87% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
CMF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMF drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMF and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) is 2.02%, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that CMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.