CMF vs. GVI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI).
CMF and GVI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007. GVI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both CMF and GVI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMF or GVI.
Correlation
The correlation between CMF and GVI is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
CMF vs. GVI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CMF:
0.03
GVI:
2.19
CMF:
0.07
GVI:
3.42
CMF:
1.01
GVI:
1.41
CMF:
0.03
GVI:
0.97
CMF:
0.10
GVI:
6.60
CMF:
1.49%
GVI:
1.08%
CMF:
5.03%
GVI:
3.27%
CMF:
-16.45%
GVI:
-12.93%
CMF:
-4.25%
GVI:
-0.51%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMF achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly lower than GVI's 2.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMF having a 1.60% annualized return and GVI not far ahead at 1.67%.
CMF
-2.57%
-0.69%
-1.63%
0.57%
0.46%
1.60%
GVI
2.72%
0.88%
2.52%
7.34%
0.53%
1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMF vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GVI's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMF vs. GVI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CMF
GVI
CMF vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMF vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison
CMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than GVI's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.94% | 2.78% | 2.29% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% | 2.80% |
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.36% | 3.40% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.46% | 1.84% | 2.29% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.75% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
CMF vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMF drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, which is greater than GVI's maximum drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMF and GVI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMF vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison
iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) at 1.28%. This indicates that CMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.