PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMDT vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMDT and CLOZ is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

CMDT vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.84%
6.05%
CMDT
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMDT:

0.34

CLOZ:

6.85

Sortino Ratio

CMDT:

0.87

CLOZ:

9.60

Omega Ratio

CMDT:

1.16

CLOZ:

3.69

Calmar Ratio

CMDT:

0.33

CLOZ:

8.48

Martin Ratio

CMDT:

3.12

CLOZ:

54.23

Ulcer Index

CMDT:

5.55%

CLOZ:

0.22%

Daily Std Dev

CMDT:

50.32%

CLOZ:

1.72%

Max Drawdown

CMDT:

-56.29%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

CMDT:

-42.65%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDT achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 1.48% return.


CMDT

YTD

7.91%

1M

9.09%

6M

16.83%

1Y

18.19%

5Y*

-2.85%

10Y*

-2.69%

CLOZ

YTD

1.48%

1M

0.92%

6M

6.05%

1Y

11.67%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMDT vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expense ratio chart for CMDT: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMDT vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMDT is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMDT is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMDT is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMDT vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMDT, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.346.85
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMDT, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.879.60
The chart of Omega ratio for CMDT, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.163.69
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMDT, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.628.48
The chart of Martin ratio for CMDT, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.1254.23
CMDT
CLOZ

The current CMDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 6.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDT and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.34
6.85
CMDT
CLOZ

Dividends

CMDT vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than CLOZ's 8.78% yield.


TTM20242023
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
7.83%8.45%2.71%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.78%9.09%8.81%

Drawdowns

CMDT vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDT drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDT and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.44%
0
CMDT
CLOZ

Volatility

CMDT vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a higher volatility of 35.17% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.21%. This indicates that CMDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
35.17%
0.21%
CMDT
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab