PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCO vs. WNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMCO vs. WNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and Wabash National Corporation (WNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCO achieves a -17.73% return, which is significantly lower than WNC's -5.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCO has outperformed WNC with an annualized return of -0.19%, while WNC has yielded a comparatively lower -3.80% annualized return.


CMCO

1D
-9.22%
1M
-8.09%
YTD
-17.73%
6M
-16.96%
1Y
-3.73%
3Y*
-27.64%
5Y*
-21.89%
10Y*
-0.19%

WNC

1D
1.26%
1M
5.67%
YTD
-5.72%
6M
-11.74%
1Y
-10.00%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-11.55%
10Y*
-3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCO vs. WNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
-17.73%-52.93%-3.85%21.12%-29.26%20.95%-3.27%33.65%-24.23%48.64%
WNC
Wabash National Corporation
-5.72%-48.12%-32.19%14.94%18.17%15.53%20.30%15.52%-38.80%39.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCO and WNC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 1996

0.38

Over the past year, CMCO and WNC have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMCO:

$404.29M

WNC:

$326.32M

EPS

CMCO:

-$7.97

WNC:

-$1.56

PS Ratio

CMCO:

0.21

WNC:

0.23

PB Ratio

CMCO:

0.61

WNC:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMCO:

$1.89B

WNC:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMCO:

$567.40M

WNC:

$29.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMCO:

$23.62M

WNC:

-$18.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMCO vs. WNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCO
CMCO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

WNC
WNC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNC Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCO vs. WNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCOWNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

-0.23

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.19

-0.46

+0.27

CMCO vs. WNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the WNC Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCO and WNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCOWNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

-0.20

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

-0.25

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

-0.08

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.00

+0.01

Drawdowns

CMCO vs. WNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCO drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, roughly equal to the maximum WNC drawdown of -98.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCO and WNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCOWNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.20%

-98.61%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.14%

-43.80%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.13%

-76.39%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.58%

-76.39%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.37%

-76.39%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.18%

-74.40%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.53%

-55.55%

+17.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.33%

21.67%

-2.34%

Volatility

CMCO vs. WNC - Volatility Comparison

Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a higher volatility of 16.16% compared to Wabash National Corporation (WNC) at 13.46%. This indicates that CMCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCOWNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.16%

13.46%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.92%

38.15%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.78%

51.28%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.86%

46.43%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.95%

44.99%

-1.04%

Dividends

CMCO vs. WNC - Dividend Comparison

CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than WNC's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
1.99%1.62%0.75%0.72%0.83%0.52%0.62%0.57%0.63%0.40%0.59%0.85%
WNC
Wabash National Corporation
4.00%3.70%1.87%1.25%1.42%1.64%1.39%2.72%2.29%1.38%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CMCO vs. WNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbus McKinnon Corporation and Wabash National Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.13B
303.23M
(CMCO) Total Revenue
(WNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMCO vs. WNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Columbus McKinnon Corporation and Wabash National Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
28.1%
-3.5%
Portfolio components
CMCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a gross profit of 317.62M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.1%.

WNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wabash National Corporation reported a gross profit of -10.58M and revenue of 303.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.5%.

CMCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported an operating income of -160.39M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.2%.

WNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wabash National Corporation reported an operating income of -52.36M and revenue of 303.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.3%.

CMCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a net income of -238.23M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of -21.1%.

WNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wabash National Corporation reported a net income of -45.17M and revenue of 303.23M, resulting in a net margin of -14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMCO and WNC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMCO has higher volatility (16.16%) compared to WNC (13.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCO dropped -95.20% vs WNC's -98.61%.

CMCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMCO and WNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer