CMCO vs. SPY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).

SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.

Performance

CMCO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMCO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMCO Columbus McKinnon Corporation	-16.65%	-52.93%	-3.85%	21.12%	-29.26%	20.95%	-3.27%	33.65%	-24.23%	48.64%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	-3.65%	17.72%	24.89%	26.18%	-18.18%	28.73%	18.33%	31.22%	-4.57%	21.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCO achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCO has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -0.19%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.

CMCO

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -24.97%
• YTD: -16.65%
• 6M: -2.48%
• 1Y: -12.68%
• 3Y*: -26.41%
• 5Y*: -22.50%
• 10Y*: -0.19%

SPY

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -3.65%
• 6M: -1.42%
• 1Y: 18.14%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMCO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCO

CMCO Risk / Return Rank: 30
CMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SPY

SPY Risk / Return Rank: 59
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMCO	SPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	0.96	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	1.49	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.23	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.53	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	7.27	-8.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMCO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCO and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMCO	SPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	0.96	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.51	0.70	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	0.79	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.56	-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between CMCO and SPY is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CMCO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than SPY's 1.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMCO Columbus McKinnon Corporation	1.95%	1.62%	0.75%	0.72%	0.83%	0.52%	0.62%	0.57%	0.63%	0.40%	0.59%	0.85%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	1.13%	1.07%	1.21%	1.40%	1.65%	1.20%	1.52%	1.75%	2.04%	1.80%	2.03%	2.06%

Drawdowns

CMCO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCO drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCO and SPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCO	SPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.20%	-55.19%	-40.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.11%	-12.05%	-28.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.37%	-24.50%	-51.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.37%	-33.72%	-42.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.83%	-5.53%	-67.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.34%	-9.09%	-29.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.25%	2.54%	+14.71%

Volatility

CMCO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.35%. This indicates that CMCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCO	SPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.12%	5.35%	+9.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.07%	9.50%	+27.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.11%	19.06%	+39.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.16%	17.06%	+27.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.54%	17.92%	+25.62%