CMCO vs. SHYF
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMCO or SHYF.
Correlation
The correlation between CMCO and SHYF is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CMCO vs. SHYF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CMCO:
-0.11
SHYF:
-0.11
CMCO:
0.06
SHYF:
0.25
CMCO:
1.01
SHYF:
1.03
CMCO:
-0.08
SHYF:
-0.07
CMCO:
-0.20
SHYF:
-0.37
CMCO:
18.21%
SHYF:
16.33%
CMCO:
32.00%
SHYF:
55.81%
CMCO:
-95.20%
SHYF:
-94.35%
CMCO:
-32.01%
SHYF:
-78.16%
Fundamentals
CMCO:
$1.10B
SHYF:
$432.56M
CMCO:
$0.52
SHYF:
-$0.10
CMCO:
$1.00B
SHYF:
$787.08M
CMCO:
$337.10M
SHYF:
$142.17M
CMCO:
$113.12M
SHYF:
$19.13M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCO achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than SHYF's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCO has underperformed SHYF with an annualized return of 3.48%, while SHYF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.
CMCO
-5.61%
1.54%
4.85%
-5.44%
-1.05%
3.48%
SHYF
-4.81%
-13.78%
-1.92%
-7.68%
-8.34%
8.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMCO vs. SHYF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMCO vs. SHYF - Dividend Comparison
CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SHYF's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCO Columbus McKinnon Corporation | 0.77% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.57% | 0.63% | 0.40% | 0.59% | 0.85% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
SHYF The Shyft Group, Inc. | 1.75% | 1.64% | 0.80% | 0.20% | 0.35% | 0.55% | 1.38% | 0.63% | 1.08% | 3.22% | 1.90% | 1.49% |
Drawdowns
CMCO vs. SHYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCO drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SHYF drawdown of -94.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCO and SHYF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMCO vs. SHYF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) is 9.11%, while The Shyft Group, Inc. (SHYF) has a volatility of 18.94%. This indicates that CMCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CMCO vs. SHYF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbus McKinnon Corporation and The Shyft Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities