PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCO vs. MTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CMCO vs. MTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMCO vs. MTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
-16.65%-52.93%-3.85%21.12%-29.26%20.95%-3.27%33.65%-24.23%48.64%
MTW
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
0.50%31.33%-45.30%82.21%-50.73%39.67%-23.94%18.48%-62.46%64.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMCO:

$414.72M

MTW:

$440.04M

EPS

CMCO:

$0.21

MTW:

$0.20

PE Ratio

CMCO:

68.69

MTW:

60.41

PEG Ratio

CMCO:

1.84

MTW:

1.89

PS Ratio

CMCO:

0.41

MTW:

0.19

PB Ratio

CMCO:

0.45

MTW:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMCO:

$1.00B

MTW:

$2.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMCO:

$336.35M

MTW:

$404.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMCO:

$76.21M

MTW:

$95.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCO achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than MTW's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCO has outperformed MTW with an annualized return of -0.19%, while MTW has yielded a comparatively lower -3.63% annualized return.


CMCO

1D
-1.38%
1M
-24.97%
YTD
-16.65%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-12.68%
3Y*
-26.41%
5Y*
-22.50%
10Y*
-0.19%

MTW

1D
3.43%
1M
-18.80%
YTD
0.50%
6M
18.72%
1Y
38.35%
3Y*
-10.99%
5Y*
-10.18%
10Y*
-3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbus McKinnon Corporation

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Often compared with MTW:
MTW vs. GENCMTW vs. RAIL

Return for Risk

CMCO vs. MTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCO
CMCO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MTW
MTW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCO vs. MTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCOMTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

0.77

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

1.34

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.17

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.27

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.80

2.68

-3.49

CMCO vs. MTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the MTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCO and MTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCOMTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.77

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

-0.21

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

-0.07

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.06

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CMCO and MTW is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CMCO vs. MTW - Dividend Comparison

CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while MTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
1.95%1.62%0.75%0.72%0.83%0.52%0.62%0.57%0.63%0.40%0.59%0.85%
MTW
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.52%

Drawdowns

CMCO vs. MTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCO drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, roughly equal to the maximum MTW drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCO and MTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCOMTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.20%

-96.25%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.11%

-31.74%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.37%

-73.44%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.37%

-83.39%

+7.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.83%

-93.76%

+20.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.34%

-48.70%

+10.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.25%

15.01%

+2.24%

Volatility

CMCO vs. MTW - Volatility Comparison

Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) at 12.94%. This indicates that CMCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMCOMTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

12.94%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.07%

31.23%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.11%

49.80%

+8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.16%

49.74%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.54%

52.26%

-8.72%

Financials

CMCO vs. MTW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Columbus McKinnon Corporation and The Manitowoc Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
258.66M
677.10M
(CMCO) Total Revenue
(MTW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMCO vs. MTW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Columbus McKinnon Corporation and The Manitowoc Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
34.5%
16.7%
Portfolio components
CMCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a gross profit of 89.16M and revenue of 258.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

MTW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.30M and revenue of 677.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

CMCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported an operating income of 16.17M and revenue of 258.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MTW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.20M and revenue of 677.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

CMCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a net income of 6.00M and revenue of 258.66M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

MTW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported a net income of 7.00M and revenue of 677.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.