PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMC vs. V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMC vs. V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Visa Inc. (V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMC achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than V's -6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CMC has outperformed V with an annualized return of 18.73%, while V has yielded a comparatively lower 16.66% annualized return.


CMC

1D
1.29%
1M
1.93%
YTD
6.48%
6M
4.59%
1Y
52.40%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
18.73%

V

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-6.86%
1Y
-2.77%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
16.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMC vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
6.48%41.52%0.41%4.99%35.05%79.83%-5.45%42.81%-23.17%0.33%
V
Visa Inc.
-6.49%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CMC and V is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between CMC and V has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

CMC:

$4.50

V:

$15.24

PE Ratio

CMC:

16.30

V:

21.43

PEG Ratio

CMC:

1.56

V:

1.32

PS Ratio

CMC:

0.98

V:

11.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMC:

$8.39B

V:

$43.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMC:

$1.49B

V:

$16.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMC:

$905.85M

V:

$27.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMC vs. V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMC
CMC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMC vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.00

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

-0.16

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

-0.35

+5.26

CMC vs. V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the V Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC and V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMC vs. V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, which is greater than V's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.77%

-51.90%

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

-17.18%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.63%

-20.38%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.63%

-28.60%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.78%

-36.36%

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.64%

-11.82%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-8.27%

-15.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.69%

8.04%

+2.65%

Volatility

CMC vs. V - Volatility Comparison

Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.86%. This indicates that CMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

5.86%

+4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.01%

16.80%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.61%

21.48%

+13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.58%

22.84%

+12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.77%

24.47%

+15.30%

Dividends

CMC vs. V - Dividend Comparison

CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than V's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.01%1.04%1.41%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%
V
Visa Inc.
0.80%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

CMC vs. V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial Metals Company and Visa Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.13B
11.23B
(CMC) Total Revenue
(V) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMC vs. V - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commercial Metals Company and Visa Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.2%
-79.3%
Portfolio components
CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMC and V have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMC has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to V (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMC dropped -83.77% vs V's -51.90%.

CMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMC and V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer