CMBS vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CMBS and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMBS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CMBS and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CMBS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMBS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | -0.13% | 7.67% | 4.27% | 5.06% | -11.21% | -1.82% | 7.86% | 7.94% | 0.77% | 2.95% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CMBS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.16%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
CMBS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMBS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CMBS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CMBS
VOO
CMBS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.98 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.50 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.53 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 7.29 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.98 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.70 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.78 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.83 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBS and VOO is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CMBS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.52% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
CMBS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -33.99% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -11.98% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.87% | -24.52% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.87% | -33.99% | +18.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -6.29% | +4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -3.72% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 2.52% | -1.88% |
Volatility
CMBS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) is 1.50%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that CMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMBS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 5.29% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 9.44% | -6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 18.10% | -14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 16.82% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 17.99% | -12.22% |