PortfoliosLab logo
CMBS vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMBS and VOO is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

CMBS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMBS:

1.50

VOO:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

CMBS:

2.22

VOO:

0.89

Omega Ratio

CMBS:

1.27

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CMBS:

0.79

VOO:

0.57

Martin Ratio

CMBS:

5.43

VOO:

2.18

Ulcer Index

CMBS:

1.34%

VOO:

4.85%

Daily Std Dev

CMBS:

4.91%

VOO:

19.11%

Max Drawdown

CMBS:

-16.07%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CMBS:

-2.24%

VOO:

-7.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CMBS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.00%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


CMBS

YTD

3.02%

1M

1.18%

6M

3.02%

1Y

7.35%

5Y*

0.68%

10Y*

2.00%

VOO

YTD

-3.41%

1M

7.59%

6M

-5.06%

1Y

9.79%

5Y*

15.86%

10Y*

12.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMBS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMBS vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMBS is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMBS is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMBS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMBS is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMBS is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMBS is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMBS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMBS and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMBS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than VOO's 1.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
3.36%3.31%2.97%2.65%2.23%2.83%2.74%2.70%2.50%2.29%2.31%2.15%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.34%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CMBS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.07%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMBS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) is 1.16%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that CMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...