PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMBS vs. FXNAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMBS and FXNAX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

CMBS vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.51%
1.41%
CMBS
FXNAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMBS:

1.09

FXNAX:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

CMBS:

1.64

FXNAX:

1.03

Omega Ratio

CMBS:

1.20

FXNAX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CMBS:

0.56

FXNAX:

0.29

Martin Ratio

CMBS:

3.94

FXNAX:

1.80

Ulcer Index

CMBS:

1.39%

FXNAX:

2.11%

Daily Std Dev

CMBS:

5.01%

FXNAX:

5.41%

Max Drawdown

CMBS:

-15.87%

FXNAX:

-19.34%

Current Drawdown

CMBS:

-4.38%

FXNAX:

-7.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CMBS has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.


CMBS

YTD

0.53%

1M

0.76%

6M

2.21%

1Y

5.18%

5Y*

0.55%

10Y*

1.72%

FXNAX

YTD

-0.20%

1M

0.21%

6M

1.31%

1Y

3.80%

5Y*

-0.18%

10Y*

1.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMBS vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
Expense ratio chart for CMBS: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for FXNAX: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMBS vs. FXNAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMBS is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMBS is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMBS is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMBS is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMBS is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMBS is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FXNAX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FXNAX is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FXNAX is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FXNAX is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FXNAX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FXNAX is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMBS vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMBS, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.060.70
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMBS, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.591.03
The chart of Omega ratio for CMBS, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.191.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMBS, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.540.29
The chart of Martin ratio for CMBS, currently valued at 3.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.791.80
CMBS
FXNAX

The current CMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMBS and FXNAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.06
0.70
CMBS
FXNAX

Dividends

CMBS vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FXNAX's 4.55% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
3.29%3.31%2.97%2.65%2.46%2.83%2.74%2.70%2.50%2.30%2.31%2.15%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
4.55%4.54%3.67%3.04%1.81%2.10%2.69%3.19%2.52%2.52%2.69%2.59%

Drawdowns

CMBS vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and FXNAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.38%
-7.99%
CMBS
FXNAX

Volatility

CMBS vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) have volatilities of 1.52% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.52%
1.51%
CMBS
FXNAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab