PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMA vs. NFLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMA vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMA vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%8.58%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
3.21%1.66%66.37%3.45%

Returns By Period


CMA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLY

1D
1.57%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
3.21%
6M
-16.09%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMA vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMA

NFLY
NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMA vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CMA vs. NFLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMANFLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Correlation

The correlation between CMA and NFLY is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CMA vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison

CMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than NFLY's 60.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.40%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
60.91%61.53%49.91%11.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMA vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMANFLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.46%

Volatility

CMA vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMANFLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%