PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMA vs. NFLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMA and NFLY is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

CMA vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.12%
64.47%
CMA
NFLY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMA:

0.03

NFLY:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

CMA:

0.28

NFLY:

1.64

Omega Ratio

CMA:

1.04

NFLY:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

CMA:

0.02

NFLY:

1.86

Martin Ratio

CMA:

0.11

NFLY:

6.54

Ulcer Index

CMA:

9.21%

NFLY:

4.58%

Daily Std Dev

CMA:

34.61%

NFLY:

25.91%

Max Drawdown

CMA:

-78.35%

NFLY:

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

CMA:

-39.99%

NFLY:

-16.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMA achieves a -15.49% return, which is significantly lower than NFLY's -4.44% return.


CMA

YTD

-15.49%

1M

-10.34%

6M

-10.24%

1Y

3.16%

5Y*

16.68%

10Y*

5.01%

NFLY

YTD

-4.44%

1M

-2.66%

6M

14.65%

1Y

29.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMA vs. NFLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMA is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMA is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMA is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMA is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMA is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMA is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NFLY is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NFLY is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NFLY is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NFLY is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMA vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
CMA: 0.03
NFLY: 1.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CMA: 0.28
NFLY: 1.64
The chart of Omega ratio for CMA, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CMA: 1.04
NFLY: 1.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
CMA: 0.04
NFLY: 1.86
The chart of Martin ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
CMA: 0.11
NFLY: 6.54

The current CMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the NFLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMA and NFLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.03
1.16
CMA
NFLY

Dividends

CMA vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison

CMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than NFLY's 54.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
5.50%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%1.69%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
54.38%49.91%11.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMA vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMA drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMA and NFLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-27.35%
-16.09%
CMA
NFLY

Volatility

CMA vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison

Comerica Incorporated (CMA) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 10.89%. This indicates that CMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.99%
10.89%
CMA
NFLY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab