CLX vs. LMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Clorox Company (CLX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).

Performance

CLX vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Clorox Company (CLX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLX vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLX The Clorox Company	3.92%	-35.59%	17.72%	4.99%	-17.00%	-11.50%	34.46%	2.23%	6.55%	27.14%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	25.62%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLX : $12.63B LMT : $140.16B
EPS CLX : $6.14 LMT : $21.53
PE Ratio CLX : 16.87 LMT : 28.07
PS Ratio CLX : 1.88 LMT : 1.88
Total Revenue (TTM) CLX : $6.76B LMT : $75.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLX : $2.98B LMT : $7.62B
EBITDA (TTM) CLX : $1.45B LMT : $8.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 25.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CLX has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 0.83%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.

CLX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: -14.13%
• 1Y: -26.74%
• 3Y*: -10.06%
• 5Y*: -8.74%
• 10Y*: 0.83%

LMT

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 22.63%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 13.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLX vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLX

CLX Risk / Return Rank: 9
CLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CLX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 82
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLX vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Clorox Company (CLX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLX	LMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.12	1.47	-2.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	1.90	-3.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.28	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	2.61	-3.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	6.73	-8.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLX vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLX and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLX	LMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.12	1.47	-2.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	0.59	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.57	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.39	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CLX and LMT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLX vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than LMT's 2.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLX The Clorox Company	4.77%	4.88%	2.98%	3.34%	3.33%	2.60%	2.15%	2.63%	2.41%	2.21%	2.62%	2.38%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.23%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%

Drawdowns

CLX vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLX drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLX and LMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLX	LMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.11%	-79.29%	+25.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.53%	-15.56%	-16.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.40%	-31.79%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.76%	-36.67%	-15.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.12%	-10.69%	-37.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-26.87%	+13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.22%	6.04%	+13.18%

Volatility

CLX vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The Clorox Company (CLX) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 6.40%. This indicates that CLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLX	LMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.33%	6.40%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	18.63%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.91%	26.74%	-2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.05%	22.57%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.92%	23.53%	+0.39%

Financials

CLX vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Clorox Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Clorox Company reported a gross profit of 722.00M and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.2%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 20.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.4%.

CLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Clorox Company reported an operating income of 431.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 20.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

CLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Clorox Company reported a net income of 157.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.34B and revenue of 20.33B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.