PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLX vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLXLMT
YTD Return-3.85%3.81%
1Y Return-16.15%5.67%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.04%9.45%
5Y Return (Ann)0.60%9.38%
10Y Return (Ann)7.23%14.24%
Sharpe Ratio-0.680.32
Daily Std Dev23.78%16.85%
Max Drawdown-54.12%-70.23%
Current Drawdown-36.69%-4.22%

Fundamentals


CLXLMT
Market Cap$16.84B$111.86B
EPS$1.94$27.32
PE Ratio69.9117.06
PEG Ratio0.434.44
Revenue (TTM)$7.21B$69.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.91B$8.39B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.14B$10.15B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CLX and LMT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLX vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLX achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 3.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CLX has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 7.23%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


8,000.00%9,000.00%10,000.00%11,000.00%12,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10,599.94%
9,352.38%
CLX
LMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Clorox Company

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLX vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Clorox Company (CLX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLX, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLX, currently valued at -0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLX, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.89
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLX, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLX, currently valued at -1.27, compared to the broader market-200,000.00-150,000.00-100,000.00-50,000.000.00-1.27
LMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market-200,000.00-150,000.00-100,000.00-50,000.000.001.04

CLX vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLX and LMT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.68
0.32
CLX
LMT

Dividends

CLX vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than LMT's 2.63% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLX
The Clorox Company
3.56%3.34%3.33%2.60%2.15%2.63%2.41%2.21%2.62%2.38%2.78%2.91%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.63%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%3.22%

Drawdowns

CLX vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLX and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-36.69%
-4.22%
CLX
LMT

Volatility

CLX vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The Clorox Company (CLX) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 2.80%. This indicates that CLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.55%
2.80%
CLX
LMT

Financials

CLX vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Clorox Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items