CLVT vs. CTAS
CLVT (Clarivate Plc) and CTAS (Cintas Corporation) are both stocks. CLVT operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while CTAS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CLVT returned -40.44%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for CTAS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLVT vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLVT achieves a -27.84% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's -3.89% return.
CLVT
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- -27.84%
- 6M
- -33.43%
- 1Y
- -44.47%
- 3Y*
- -34.30%
- 5Y*
- -40.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CTAS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- -3.89%
- 6M
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- -19.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
CLVT vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLVT Clarivate Plc | -27.84% | -34.25% | -45.14% | 11.03% | -64.54% | -20.83% | 76.85% | 75.92% | -0.52% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -3.89% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLVT and CTAS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CLVT and CTAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLVT:
$1.54B
CTAS:
$73.17B
CLVT:
-$0.21
CTAS:
$4.75
CLVT:
0.65
CTAS:
6.65
CLVT:
0.32
CTAS:
15.28
CLVT:
$2.45B
CTAS:
$11.03B
CLVT:
$1.63B
CTAS:
$1.33B
CLVT:
$878.30M
CTAS:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLVT vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
CLVT
CTAS
CLVT vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLVT | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.84 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.72 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.27 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLVT | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -1.02 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 | 0.73 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.52 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
CLVT vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLVT drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLVT and CTAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLVT | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -65.32% | -29.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.91% | -27.68% | -35.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.03% | -27.68% | -55.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.99% | -27.68% | -67.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.81% | -20.25% | -72.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -15.04% | -34.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.26% | 15.81% | +15.45% |
Volatility
CLVT vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Clarivate Plc (CLVT) has a higher volatility of 17.38% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 6.65%. This indicates that CLVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLVT | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.38% | 6.65% | +10.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.96% | 14.85% | +43.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.01% | 19.60% | +47.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.58% | 22.46% | +33.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.76% | 26.64% | +24.12% |
Dividends
CLVT vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
CLVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLVT Clarivate Plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Financials
CLVT vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clarivate Plc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLVT vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
CLVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clarivate Plc reported a gross profit of 393.40M and revenue of 585.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
CLVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clarivate Plc reported an operating income of 30.20M and revenue of 585.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
CLVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clarivate Plc reported a net income of -40.20M and revenue of 585.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLVT and CTAS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLVT has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to CTAS (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLVT dropped -94.99% vs CTAS's -65.32%.
CLVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLVT and CTAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer