CLVT vs. CTAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).

Performance

CLVT vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLVT vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLVT Clarivate Plc	-24.25%	-34.25%	-45.14%	11.03%	-64.54%	-20.83%	76.85%	75.92%	-0.52%
CTAS Cintas Corporation	-9.86%	3.78%	22.24%	34.82%	2.97%	26.51%	32.74%	61.73%	-1.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLVT : $1.68B CTAS : $68.81B
EPS CLVT : -$0.30 CTAS : $4.75
PS Ratio CLVT : 0.69 CTAS : 6.26
PB Ratio CLVT : 0.35 CTAS : 14.37
Total Revenue (TTM) CLVT : $2.46B CTAS : $11.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLVT : $1.62B CTAS : $1.33B
EBITDA (TTM) CLVT : $828.70M CTAS : $2.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLVT achieves a -24.25% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's -9.86% return.

CLVT

• 1D: 4.55%
• 1M: 10.00%
• YTD: -24.25%
• 6M: -33.94%
• 1Y: -35.62%
• 3Y*: -35.41%
• 5Y*: -37.83%
• 10Y*: —

CTAS

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -15.91%
• YTD: -9.86%
• 6M: -17.21%
• 1Y: -17.00%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLVT vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLVT

CLVT Risk / Return Rank: 18
CLVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CLVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CLVT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CLVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CLVT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CTAS

CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 14
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLVT vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLVT	CTAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.80	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	-1.02	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.87	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	-0.60	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	-1.31	-0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLVT vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLVT Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is higher than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLVT and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLVT	CTAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	-0.80	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.70	0.68	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	0.52	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between CLVT and CTAS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLVT vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

CLVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLVT Clarivate Plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CTAS Cintas Corporation	1.03%	0.89%	0.80%	0.83%	0.93%	0.77%	0.99%	0.95%	1.22%	1.04%	1.15%	1.15%

Drawdowns

CLVT vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLVT drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLVT and CTAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLVT	CTAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.99%	-65.32%	-29.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.91%	-26.72%	-36.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.99%	-26.72%	-68.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.45%	-25.20%	-67.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.31%	-14.99%	-33.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.39%	12.22%	+13.17%

Volatility

CLVT vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

Clarivate Plc (CLVT) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 7.96%. This indicates that CLVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLVT	CTAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.21%	7.96%	+7.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.17%	14.35%	+38.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.16%	21.38%	+47.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.37%	22.49%	+31.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.29%	26.52%	+23.77%

Financials

CLVT vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clarivate Plc and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Clarivate Plc reported a gross profit of 412.20M and revenue of 617.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

CLVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Clarivate Plc reported an operating income of 41.40M and revenue of 617.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

CLVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Clarivate Plc reported a net income of 3.10M and revenue of 617.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.