PortfoliosLab logo
CLU.TO vs. ILCV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLU.TO and ILCV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLU.TO:

0.37

ILCV:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

CLU.TO:

0.61

ILCV:

0.74

Omega Ratio

CLU.TO:

1.10

ILCV:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CLU.TO:

0.33

ILCV:

0.48

Martin Ratio

CLU.TO:

1.24

ILCV:

1.96

Ulcer Index

CLU.TO:

4.44%

ILCV:

3.70%

Daily Std Dev

CLU.TO:

14.62%

ILCV:

15.74%

Max Drawdown

CLU.TO:

-39.93%

ILCV:

-58.63%

Current Drawdown

CLU.TO:

-7.35%

ILCV:

-6.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLU.TO achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's -1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CLU.TO has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 7.28%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.


CLU.TO

YTD

-1.78%

1M

11.06%

6M

-5.38%

1Y

4.34%

5Y*

14.06%

10Y*

7.28%

ILCV

YTD

-1.89%

1M

5.16%

6M

-5.09%

1Y

6.07%

5Y*

13.51%

10Y*

9.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLU.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLU.TO vs. ILCV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLU.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLU.TO is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCV is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCV is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCV is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCV is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCV is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCV is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CLU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLU.TO and ILCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

CLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than ILCV's 2.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLU.TO
iShares US Fundamental Index ETF
1.37%1.32%1.35%1.63%0.82%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
2.08%2.00%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%2.44%

Drawdowns

CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.93%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLU.TO and ILCV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CLU.TO vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 5.47%. This indicates that CLU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...